Climate Crisis? Fire the Scientists – Stephen Harper

How to deal with the climate crisis? Canada’s Conservative government has the answer. Fire the scientists. No more funds. No access to government labs. The Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (CFCAS) is being cut off.

In this and many other politically-loaded decisions they are trying to build rightwing support for a fall election. Harper’s decision to kill CFCAS plays to climate deniers and advocates of business-as-usual.

"Canada will lose the capacity to understand its own environment… [and] will depend on third parties” at a time when a major drought is hitting the Prairies, wildfires ravage BC, and Arctic ice is disappearing."

[Note: quotations of scientists below have been translated back into English, and may not reflect their exact words. Références en français en bas.]

The Montreal daily Le Devoir has been reporting a 10-day long world climate conference here, MOCA-09. Canada’s English media have been strangely silent. More than 1600 scientists conclude that the greenhouse effect is happening faster than predicted by the IPCC, and the impacts worse. This is not what the Tories want to hear.

Heavily bankrolled by oil, coal, tarsands and high-energy-user lobbies, they reneged within a day on their July 8 commitment to the G8 climate target. In this and many other politically-loaded decisions they are trying to build rightwing support for a fall election. Harper’s decision to kill CFCAS plays to climate deniers and advocates of business-as-usual.

“Its funding will run out at the end of this year… there is no replacement program… a large number of scientists will be out of a job,” says physicist James Drummond of Dalhousie University. “Canada will lose the capacity to understand its own environment… [and] will depend on third parties” at a time when a major drought is hitting the Prairies, wildfires ravage BC, and Arctic ice is disappearing. The troposphere directly affects our agriculture and quality of life, he says — each country impacts others: the Asian ‘brown cloud’ now pollutes Canadian skies, and our emissions reach Europe.

Visibly troubled by his own data, Drummond says that recent research confirms the most pessimistic of the IPCC scenarios (see graph below). The impacts will not be immediate, but they will last a thousand years.

Others foresee a brain drain. Ted Shepherd of U of T says his experienced researchers “are already applying for posts abroad”. His 15-year study, which gave “promising results” in the last 3-4 years, will be set back by a decade. Lawrence Mysack and Jacques Derome of McGill point to the hypocrisy of a government that hands out old rifles to Inuit to “protect Arctic sovereignty” while slashing research. Not only research grants are in question, but access to government research equipment at Environment Canada, NRC and Canada Space Agency may be cut off.

CFCAS director Dawn Conway soft-pedals the problem: the Ministry has “not said no, not said yes – but it’s now urgent…What good will sophisticated labs be if we don’t have the people to operate them, and funds for researchers?”

Canada’s retrograde move contrasts with the UN secretary-general’s call six months ago for massive investment in mitigation: "The economic crisis is serious; yet when it comes to climate change, the stakes are far higher. The climate crisis affects our people’s lives, both now and far into the future.” Managing the financial crisis requires a global stimulus and "a big part of that spending" should be directed at fighting global warming. "We need a green New Deal." Two years ago he warned that "global warming poses as much danger to the world as war."

*****

IPCC scenarios (click on graphic to see details)
image0011See also details of UNEP’s proposed Green New Deal aka Green Economy Initiative; North American Drought Monitor and forecasts.

En français: articles signés Pauline Gravel dans Le Devoir du 29-7-09 et 30-07-09; le New Deal vert de l’ONU.

http://mecteam.blogspot.com/2009/07/climate-crisis-gag-scientists-steven.html

“Climate policy is characterized by the habituation of low expectations and a culture of failure. There is an urgent need to understand global warming and the tipping points for dangerous impacts that we have already crossed as a sustainability emergency that takes us beyond the politics of failure-inducing compromise. We are now in a race between climate tipping points and political tipping points.”
David Spratt, Philip Sutton, Climate Code Red, Australia, Published July, 2008

~ by Cory Morningstar on August 10, 2009.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: